PART   6

                GRAVITY MADE SIMPLE

    It has been a while since I sat down and started this new section. If you have read the first five parts you would have noticed many repeating themes and ideas. Instead of rewriting and consolidating my past ideas I left them there so you can see how my ideas and thoughts have changed over time, and of course my acquiring more knowledge. It is probably now time to consolidate my past work into something shorter and easier to read. But first I’m going to give you this new part which is a short summary of all the rest. You might want to read this part first and then go back and read the first five parts to see how I came to my conclusions.

    However, please remember my ideas are not proven theory. This is a thought process based on common sense and logic and tied to known theories and properties associated with the fabric of space.

    If you have not read Parts 1-5 you would not understand my explanation of gravity so this is a quick description of gravity as I see it. I believe gravity exists only because of the laws which govern the conservation of energy.

    The fabric of space is the conveyance of energy and the substance which dictates how that energy behaves. Energy is a vibration in the fabric of space and mass is a fixed bundle of energy. Energy distorts the fabric of space making it denser but only mass produces a gravitational field.

    When an object enters a denser area of the fabric it causes that object’s time to slow down. This means there is a net loss of energy in that object. This loss of energy is in violation of the conservation of energy. To make up for this energy loss the object increases its velocity. It is this change of velocity that is the mechanism which maintains the object’s constant energy. When we experience gravity we are experiencing this velocity change.

    When an object enters the gravitational field of the earth its time slows and its gravitational field distorts causing the object to increase its velocity towards the earth and since the gravitational field of the earth increases as the object gets closer the object’s motion continues to increase. When the object strikes the earth’s surface the object stops its motion, but there is still a time difference across the object and its gravitational field which creates a force against the surface of the earth. Thus the conservation of energy is preserved.

    How can mass use the fabric to cause the motion we see as gravity since the fabric offers no resistance to mass traveling within it? The fabric can create motion because mass in the fabric does have a resistance to acceleration called inertia which is a resistance to a change of motion. Any time differences in two areas of the fabric caused by the presence of mass will cause the two masses to move toward each other. It is the inertia properties of the fabric that generate the actual movement of objects, thus creating gravity.

    How? Inertia is caused by the extended gravitational field of the particle into the fabric. This is because it lags behind when the particle is accelerated. When the particle stops accelerating the field catches up and maintains the particle at some constant motion. When a particle enters a gravitational field its gravitational field is distorted in the opposite direction from that of an accelerated particle. Thus the particle’s gravitational field now drags the particle toward the other object’s gravitational field.

    Let me simplify. The gravitational field of an object causes the object to have inertia because the gravitational field lags behind the object when it is accelerated. When the gravitational field of an object is distorted without the object being accelerated, such as in some other object’s gravitational field, the object is dragged or pulled along by its own gravitational field toward the other object. The motion created by the gravitational fields of both objects will perfectly match the amount of energy needed to make up for the energy loss created by the denser area of the fabric caused by their fields. The gravitational field of a particle is an integral part of the particle itself so the gravitational field, by itself, can be used to put a particle into motion.

    I believed earlier that gravity was a migration, but here gravity is obviously a pull between two merging gravitational fields trying to balance out energy caused by fabric density variations.

    To explain how gravity works we must understand what energy is and what created it in the first place. But what " is " energy? Energy is a distorting vibration in the fabric of space. The fabric in my explanation is all encompassing in the universe and it existed before the introduction of vibrating energy. The vibration in the fabric manifests itself to us as mass, light, radiation, and time. These vibrations travel within the fabric somewhat like a sound wave travels through the air. The fabric itself is totally invisible to us which makes its comprehension difficult.

    Does all energy in the fabric have mass? It is quite clear that Einstein’s equation where E=mc² says that all energy has mass. It is also clear, from experimental results, that radiation or light does not have mass but has energy. This contradiction has always disturbed me. So is the equation wrong or is there another way to look at energy other than in terms of mass.

    The answer to this has to do with a particle’s formation and its energy density. Particles are created when there is an extreme energy density in the fabric. But there is more to this energy which is vibrating within the fabric for it is not just simply a vibration of the fabric’s structure, even though I have stated it simply as a vibration to help one visualize what is happening. The energy that is introduced into the fabric causes the fabric to increase its density and not just push the fabric around where the energy exists. In other words, it adds itself to the fabric giving the fabric more substance.

    Energy is defined as radiation, and mass is defined as condensed radiation but with substance. Mass exhibits a resistance to motion and that resistance is how we define how much mass is present. Mass is confined to particles or fixed bundles of energy.

    To illustrate this better let’s take a closer look at energy and mass. First let’s create a very dense area in the fabric by applying a great deal of light energy to that area. This area would have defined limits, and even though the fabric in that area would be very dense it would in fact have no mass because it is pure energy. If we were to enter into that high energy area that I created we would have a time change, however we would not feel a gravitational attraction to it when outside that area. Pure radiation does not have a gravitational field. It is simply a place in space where the fabric is denser.

    Mass only comes into existence when particles are formed because particles are a fixed bundle of vibrating energy which are treated by the fabric differently.

    The fabric is a creature of constant energy no matter what form the energy takes. Energy itself could only be described as movement or motion of something. Therefore we can only describe the "is" of energy as motion without giving it a substance for it may not have one. This also means that the fabric has other properties which must be satisfied when changes occur within it.

Particles and Gravity

    Particles become really interesting things when you look at the structure of the fabric and how it handles vibrating energy. A particle as I envision it in string theory is a vibrating loop of energy electromagnetic in nature. The basic particle is extremely small, somewhere in the vicinity of 10^-32cm. This means that the frequency of vibration must be extremely high; in fact one would say impossibly high. But this does not have to be the case. When we are dealing with particles we are dealing with something completely out of time with our own reference frame. The energy vibrations traveling in a particle loop travel at the speed of light which means its time is running next to zero, our reference. That is why particles are stable and decay very slowly. This is a reference frame thing. We observe the universe from a reference frame where the fabric of space is not very dense. Thus we base all time differences and energy differences from this reference.

Particle Size

    But why is a particle so small when we know the energy waves that created it were large? Let’s look at how a particle was formed, in my scenario of course, and see if I can produce a simple explanation. When energy is introduced into the fabric the fabric warps the energy and increases the fabric’s density. The warping occurs because the fabric is nonlinear when exposed to energy. This is why inertia exists. Thus the fabric causes the energy to loop creating particles.

    Particle size wholly depends upon the density of the fabric the particle resides in. The initial vibrating waves of energy that created the particles in the first place, like light waves, are large but the final particle is much smaller. So how can this be?

    In my scenario there is an explanation to the particle’s final size. To illustrate this I use my magic crystal which I used in earlier parts to help visualize things. If a pulse of light enters the crystal and proceeds to travel through it the light pulse will shrink in size and will continue to do so until it reaches the densest part of the crystal. Then as it works its way out the other side, it will again increase in size and exit the crystal exactly as it had entered.

    The light pulse acts in this way because it contains a fixed amount of energy which prevents it from changing its original parameter. If you were moving along with the light pulse as it passed through the crystal you would have observed no change. Relativity; it’s a neat thing. The magic crystal I use is a sphere which has a low density far out from its center and then increases its density as one moves towards its center. The center density is extremely dense causing the light pulse to slow down or be delayed in its travel. The density of the crystal represents the density changes of the fabric in which all mass and energy must respond.

    Now let’s create a particle to illustrate how a particle’s small size comes about. We start by taking beams of energy and focus them on a single point. When we do this the density of the fabric in the area where the beams of energy are focused increases dramatically, thus time and motion slows for all energy vibrations in that area. At some energy level an energy loop is formed creating a particle. The particle loop is a stable high-energy state that now separates itself from the energy we used to create the particle in the first place. Thus the particle’s energy is now fixed. This is very important to remember.

    When a particle loop is formed the fabric becomes denser within the loop thus shrinking the loop causing the fabric to become even more dense within the loop. Thus the loop shrinks even more. The particle that we made now gets smaller because of its self-imposed fabric density change. The particle continues to shrink until it reaches a minimum size or its stable point. Since we are an observer, from our reference frame looking into this area from the outside the particle is now extremely small, but the reality is the particle itself and its internal characteristics have not changed at all. The particle now occupies an extremely small area of space but it still contains all the energy we used to make it.

    If the particle’s loop was to be broken for some reason then all the energy that we used to create it would return to its original state or the conditions we used at the beginning of this process. Basically speaking, it would explode.

    This process would be like watching a large object enter my magic crystal and move to the crystal’s center. Here of course the crystal represents a denser fabric space condition. The object will act just like the light pulse did and appear to be extremely small compared to when it first entered the crystal, thus particle size now becomes relative to our observation.

    Note: When a particle enters my magic crystal its rate of travel slows down. It does not speed up as in a gravitational field as it would on earth. In fact some delay does occur when an object enters the gravitational field of the earth but because of the weakness of the earth’s gravitational field that delay becomes negligible, however when a particle enters an extremely dense gravitational field the attraction velocity is countered by the delay properties which become more prominent. All this of course is from an outside reference frame. The acceleration of gravity and the delay caused by density change will balance each other out at some point. The gravity distortion, not the density of the fabric, has its limits. You will get a sense of this as you read on.

    But there is more. A particle can only collapse so far, therefore the collapse will stop at some point. But because the particle collapses so fast it overshoots its stable size point and shrinks even further. The overshoot finally stops the particle’s collapse but due to the inertial energy of the collapse the particle rebounds and again passes its stable size point. In other words, it oscillates or vibrates back and forth at the speed of light around a common point. I can only call this the collapsing vibration effect. Because the particle’s collapsing vibration has a fixed energy and no energy loss or at least none in our time frame, the vibration becomes stable. Here the energy in the original particle determines the frequency of the collapsing vibration and its characteristics.

    This could be called a secondary vibration and not one associated with the actual particle’s loop vibration, but of course all these vibrations inter-react forming some very exotic properties. In string theory the vibrational property of a particle determines the particle’s over all characteristic. The vibration created from the particle’s collapse would be the lowest frequency vibration of the particle and thus the vibration which produces the gravitational properties of the particle.

    This collapsing vibration now produces an external field that extends outward a vast distance from the particle itself.

    This is why energy and mass are different. Energy does not possess a gravitational field while mass does, but both are produced from vibrating energy.

    As I have said before, there is absolutely no proof that a particle’s gravitational field is like that of the earth’s which extends equally in all directions. The earth’s gravitational field looks like it does because it is a combined average of an infinite number of particle fields that make up the earth. I also believe that a gravitational field of a particle is not infinite but has limits, however unlike a magnetic field the outer portion causes time to run faster because the density there is less and the inner portion of the field where the fabric density is higher time will run slower.

    The collapsing vibration field in the fabric looks something like a figure eight or like the pattern I described in Part Five. It is that field in the fabric which produces the gravitational effect we experience, not the vibrations inside the loop of the particle. This is where energy and mass are different even though the effects in the fabric are similar. There is also something else quite different and that is the collapsing vibration which creates our gravitational effect is acting directly against the fabric’s basic structure, not just enhancing it. This means that the particle’s loop energy is held hostage to the characteristics of the fabric forbidding it to propagate faster than the speed of light.

    The gravitational field is a by-product of the collapsing vibration which causes a pure density distortion in the fabric which means it is not subject to the speed of light or any of its restraints. Therefore the propagation of a gravitational field has no light speed restrictions. What the gravitational field’s propagation rate is I can only guess, but c² comes to mind, although I think this number is way too low to create the effects we see in our universe.

    It is the extended gravitational fields created by the collapsing vibration that gives a particle its mass. This is why light or radiation has energy and does increase the fabric’s density but has no mass.

    The fabric demands that all energies in it must be preserved. It is the fabric which maintains that constant and restricts the type of energy states possible thus limiting the size of our basic particles and the rate of velocity of our energy and the number of forms this energy can exist in.

    Therefore energies can change into many states as long as there is a counterbalance of that state to maintain the conservation of energy. One of these states is motion because motion is a form of energy.

    When I refer to time I am referring to clocks because they change their speed within a gravitational field or when the clocks are accelerated to some velocity. These changes all have to do with the fabric of space and its characteristics. Here the fabric’s density has a direct relationship to the speed at which our clocks run.

    Our clocks on earth determine time by an oscillating device of some sort. All of our time clocks were of course devised here on the surface of the earth, therefore all of our time references are earth surface references. Theory has told us that if a clock is accelerated to any velocity that clock will slow down. Theory also tells us that a clock will slow down in a gravitational field. These predictions have been proven to be true. This means that a clock on earth will run slower than a clock out in space moving at the same velocity as the earth because the fabric of space is thinner or less dense than the fabric at the surface of the earth due to the earth’s gravitational field.

    We can then ask the question, what is the fastest a clock will run and what is the slowest a clock will run? In this case we could say that the fastest a clock can possibly run would be in the least dense area of the fabric and with no motion compared to the fabric, and the slowest a clock would run would be in the most dense area of the fabric and the fastest velocity it could go in relation to a fabric.

    The best baseline for a clock’s time would be for us to put a clock in an area in the fabric with a low density and with as little motion as possible compared to the static fabric. Having this information would give us a good reference from which we could base our true energy and motion. This of course is not something easily done.

    Is there a way to determine how fast we are moving through the fabric and in which direction we would have to go to find a position in the fabric where we would be static or not moving in relation to the fabric? To do this we can start by assuming that if we are static in the fabric our clocks will run at their fastest rate and if we are in motion at any speed and in any direction within the fabric our clocks will run at a slower rate. So with any motion we have within the fabric will only tell us how much our clock has slowed down compared to a static position within the fabric.

    So how can we determine our motion within the fabric, if we assume the fabric is static and not moving? This of course would be a difficult task, mostly because of the relativity of time when it comes to our observations of clocks. If we observe objects moving away from us and towards us we will see that the clocks on these objects will slow down. So far we have never observed a clock that has actually run faster. But we know from practical common sense that a clock when approaching the static state of the fabric will have to speed up.

    If the earth is motionless in the fabric then all clocks leaving the earth in any direction and at the same velocity will slow down equally. If the earth is moving in relationship to the fabric in some direction then any clocks heading towards the static position of the fabric will speed up. Also, a clock heading in a direction that will make it go faster than the earth is going, in relation to the fabric, will be observed as slowing down.

    A way to determine the earth’s movement through the fabric would be to send out clocks in all directions from the earth and all at the same velocity and very carefully and accurately measure the time change of each of these clocks. Clocks moving in the direction that the earth is moving will run slower and clocks moving in the direction toward the static fabric will run faster. One would have to eliminate the effects of all other gravitational influences in the area to run this test, for a density change in the fabric will influence the clocks. There is also a problem of the time measurement because we measure velocity by using time and distance which in all due respects become relative. This would be a very difficult experiment to perform but could show us how fast we are moving in relationship to the static fabric thus providing a more stable baseline for time.

    If the earth is in fact moving at a high velocity in the static fabric of space then the clock’s time would be far easier to measure for the time differences in different directions would be greater. If we are moving very slow in the static fabric then the clocks would change little, in fact so little it might be beyond our technical abilities to measure this small time change. Of course there is another possibility, and that is that the fabric may be moving with us. In that case all bets are off.

    What can neutron stars, black holes, and the Big Bang tell us about the fabric and the effects upon the fabric’s densities and gravity?

    In Part Five I alluded to a particle’s description which contradicts the norm of science today in that we do not know if the gravitational field at the particle level is in fact uniform in all directions. I postulated that a particle’s gravitational distortion manifests itself in a field much like a magnetic field does. But in this case the field manifests itself with poles that have the effect of slower time close to the particle where the fabric is denser, and faster time at the outside poles where the fabric becomes less dense. The outside poles of the gravitational field extend themselves a great distance from the particle, in fact maybe thousands or millions of light-years from the particle itself. This means that the strength of the outside poles is extremely weak while the poles’ strength at the surface of the particle is very strong.

    Now let’s consider what the density of the fabric does to the characteristics of a particle. Because a particle has a fixed energy level a denser fabric has the effect of shrinking the size of a particle and it’s gravitational field. Knowing this we can say that a particle on the surface of the earth has shrunk in size and it’s gravitational field has become smaller. Not much of a change of course, but it does change.

    With this scenario we can rethink our perspective about the universe and the bodies that occupy it. This is a completely new vision of how our universe works. I will point out some of these ideas based on how the fabric molds and changes mass and energy.

    First let’s look at the creation of a planet. A planet is a conglomeration of particles. These particles are brought together by gravitational influences. From this mass the gravitational field appears uniform in all directions. At some point the internal forces of the particles, atoms, and molecules resist the gravitational attraction and stabilize the planet’s size. This is why the earth does not continue to collapse.

    In more extreme cases like our sun, we see that it does not completely collapse because of its nuclear fuel being burned off. Our sun has sufficient mass though to continue to collapse if the internal forces were to lessen. It is projected that when the sun’s fuel is exhausted it will indeed collapse under its own gravitational forces to a point where again a balance is reached where it again becomes stable. When this happens it will become a white dwarf.

    In further extreme cases a larger mass (one about 1.4 times that of the sun) will collapse to form a neutron star in which case the gravitational field was sufficient to force all other particles out and leave only the neutrons of our atoms. Thus a new balance occurs because the gravitational field strength was not sufficient enough to overcome the counter force of the neutrons themselves. And again a stable stellar body emerges.

    The next stage is a body with a mass larger than three times that of our sun. In this case the collapse will be so great that it will form a black hole. The gravitational field of a black hole is so strong that not even light can escape it. Earlier it was believed that nothing could escape a black hole but we have since learned that black holes can evaporate, in other words energy can somehow escape the event horizon and re-enter normal space causing the black hole to shrink in size.

    Now let’s take these events and apply my conceived conception of particles and their gravitational fields. I have stated that particles will shrink in size and their gravitational fields will collapse proportionately as they enter into a gravitational distortion or a denser area of the fabric. For particles that make up the earth the shrinkage is minute and the gravitational change of their field would be small and would be impossible to measure. But if we could observe particles within a neutron star we would find the particles’ gravitational influence has decreased to a far greater extent simply because the density of the fabric is so great.

    Let’s go one step further and place a particle inside a black hole. Here we will observe the greatest collapse of the particle and the particle’s field. In this case the particle’s entire gravitational field is now very close to the particle. This means that the gravitational influence of the particle is no longer in our universe. It effects the particle, and its mass appears to simply vanish. This leaves the particle’s gravitational energy in the event horizon to produce the gravitational influence in our universe. It is not the particles in the inside of the black hole we see because they are essentially locked away from us. As far as we are concerned there is no mass inside the black hole. As I said earlier, the existence of mass, to us, is caused by the extended field of a particle and here the particle field does not reach outside the black hole.

    It is predicted that in the center of a black hole there is a singularity and all energy is virtually sucked into that singularity. If you’re thinking ahead of me here you will realize that would not be the case. In fact a black hole is stable because the particles inside the black hole have no extended gravitational field therefore they can no longer attract other particles so a further collapse inside the black hole becomes impossible. And it is important to note that the outer portion of the particle’s field, or the so called push side, really does not push at all. This is because the outer field produces a less dense space in that area which means that other particles will not migrate in that direction. All mass moves toward slower time and away from the faster time and a less dense space creates a faster time area.

    The particles inside a black hole are simply surrounded by a less dense space, and since their fields do not reach out far enough they cannot attract other particles. This is a difficult thing to visualize.

    The mass of a black hole is determined by the particles in the event horizon and not by the particles that are trapped below the event horizon. The amount of energy inside a black hole is far greater than what can be determined from examining it from the outside.

    Does a black hole really evaporate? And if there was one, can the singularity inside a black hole evaporate?

    It is predicted that black holes evaporate over time and the mechanism of this evaporation is explained by a form of vacuum fluctuations where particles and antiparticles are formed around the event horizon.

    But is it possible that a black hole does not evaporate at all but it simply vanishes from view on its own? If so, what would cause such an event? To explore this let’s look at a stable black hole. The event horizon is an area of collapsing energy for it is where the gravitational extremes take place. You could call it a shell around the interior of the black hole which has become stable.

    The mass in the black hole’s event horizon slowly works its way toward the center area causing the fabric in that center area to become more dense thus that area shrinks in size.

    This causes the overall size of the black hole to shrink. As the particles enter the center of the black hole their outside gravitational influence disappears weakening the event horizon which in effect causes it to warm up. (When you move from a high dense space to a low dense space temperature increases. It is the same as moving from a slow time area to a fast time area) This process continues until the black hole disappears and becomes nothing more than a small particle with little or no mass but lots and lots of energy. Because the particles’ gravitational fields are not extended into our space their mass is not detectable even though the black hole is still filled with particles.

    If a black hole can evaporate as explained in the current theory, I can only assume that a singularity somehow can do the same and must, however I can see no mechanism for that to happen.

    When I first read about the Big Bang I hardly could believe what the theory was saying and that is all mass and energy in our universe today was derived from something smaller than an atom. It was inconceivable for me to realize or visualize that all the mass we have in our universe could have come from something so small. It literally boggles one’s mind and causes one to believe that this theory must be wrong. But let’s look at it in a new light.

    Let’s start by saying that at some time in the past, long before the Big Bang, a condition existed that created particles, the same kind we see today. When I speak of particles I’m speaking of the basic particle. At that time space or the fabric which created these particles was far denser than a black hole, a lot denser. Then at some time this space broke apart and left what we call singularities. Each of these singularities contained enough particles to fill our universe with the mass we see today; in fact more mass than we see today. These singularities were stable as long as the density of space or the fabric was maintained at some level.

    I am saying that space and time existed long before our Big Bang. Time is subjective to us. We perceive time because we have a memory and it starts when we first start to remember things.

    The universe does not perceive time as we do for there is no such thing. The universe simply reacts to energy and motion changes and these events are tied to the fabric’s clock, not ours. Energy changes have rules, and mass and energy must follow these rules, for there are limits to how fast these changes can take place.

    Now we have singularities floating all over the place in our space. At some point one of these singularities became unstable. Now we must remember that all of the particles inside the singularity were simply shrunk in size, our reference of course, because of the extremely dense fabric that makes up the singularity. Therefore when the singularity became unstable its fabric density lessened causing the singularity to expand and time to speed up.

    The singularity now expands into an area that has an extremely low fabric density compared to that of the singularity. The expansion means that time is speeding up. When time speeds up the temperature increases.

    The singularity continues to expand but the density of the fabric that makes up the singularity is so great that mass and radiation are still confined within it. At this point it is the fabric that is expanding. There is still no gravitational influence yet in our universe. When the expansion of the singularity reaches a point where its fabric density is less than that of a black hole, we will see radiation and particles emerge. This occurs because the gravitational influence has limits and these limits culminate around the fabric’s density of a black hole.

    At this point radiation now can escape from the expansion and the particles’ gravitational fields can now start to expand into the space around the singularities. Thus radiation and particles now emerge into our universe.

    The first part of the expansion was only the expansion of the dense fabric of space that made up the singularity. All the radiation and particles that made up the singularity were simply brought along with the fabric’s expansion. Even though mass and radiation is subject to the speed of light in the fabric, the fabric itself is not. Thus the initial expansion easily exceeds the speed of light.

    You could say that the expansion of the singularity must pass through a black hole stage but one with no event horizon, for it would be impossible for radiation and particles to enter into our universe before the density of space has decreased to permit their entry. We call this period of the Big Bang the inflationary period. This faster than light inflationary period lasted until the density of the fabric was less than the density of the fabric inside a black hole.

    At the end of the inflationary period the gravitational fields of the singularity particles increased the density of the fabric around the singularity. Thus the particle’s inertia came back into play and the expansion proceeded in a normal manner with all the speed of light restrictions. In this time period a great many other things occurred. One was the creation of matter and antimatter. This happened because of the release of a great deal of pure energy into a dense fabric. But most of these reactions reverted back to energy as the matter and antimatter pair recombined leaving only a small amount of antimatter. This means that the mass we see today already existed.

    This would mean that singularities could be traveling through our universe and we could not detect them because their gravitational fields would be contained within the singularity itself. Our universe could be filled with these particles and we would not know it.

    Under this scenario I can now easily visualize how the Big Bang proceeded and where all the mass and energy in the universe came from. It was simply always there, just tucked away in time. It would also explain why we have more matter than antimatter.

Tidbits

    Gravitational fields as I envision them are caused by the collapsing vibration and extend into a vast area of space around each particle. That field is tied directly to the particle and exists only because of the particle’s loop characteristics. If the particle is destroyed, or reverts back to the energy that created it, the field collapses and disappears. The gravitational field does not radiate energy but it does change the density of space where it exists. When the particle is put into motion the field also is put into motion with only slight delays due to the propagation rate of the field itself.

    If you were to move a black hole that has no event horizon it would be free of inertia because you are moving the fabric the particles are confined in along with the particles. It would be like moving pure energy because it does not have a gravitational field. If you try to move a particle that is inside the black hole it would have inertia

    Another consequence of my gravitational scenario is how time changes with motion. When mass is put into motion it is essentially an energy wave moving in the fabric. This means that the density of the fabric increases in that mass as the velocity of the mass increases in relationship to a static fabric. Time runs slower in a denser fabric area. In this case the actual mass does not increase because of the mass’s higher velocity. It is a pure energy thing. The mass will create a denser fabric but does not increase the gravitational properties in that area. This can be described as an increase of mass, but it is really an increase of energy and the actual mass stays constant. It also says that the particle will shrink in size along with its actual true gravitational field as the velocity increases. Again this is the difference between pure energy and mass.

    The only way we know of to make something move is to push against something else. When we walk we push against the earth; in space we have to accelerate mass from us to create our motion. Our connection to the fabric of space is pretty much next to nothing. Inertia is the only real connection we have to the fabric and it is the gravitational field that produces that connection. If we wish to use the fabric to push against we will have to develop a way to manipulate the inertia properties of the gravitational field to do so. Since I believe that the gravitational field of a particle is unidirectional, the possibility of using the fabric to push against becomes possible.

    Gravitational waves. There are many experiments going on today which are aimed at detecting a gravitational wave. In this scenario I proposed a gravitational wave per se does not really exist. If our detectors are sensitive enough we will be able to detect a change of the fabric’s density of a wave of energy passing the earth. Energy does cause an increase in the density of the fabric but does not possess a true gravitational attraction. This radiation wave and the fabric’s distortion will travel together. Thus the energy wave and the fabric’s distortion will arrive at your detector at the same time.

    When mass is destroyed it reverts back to radiation energy and the true gravitational field disappears and the extended gravitational fabric density decreases. So when we detect a gravitational change because a star exploded, the fabric density in our area will just decrease so we will see no gravitational wave. The difference between the radiated energy fields and the gravitational field is its propagation rate. The radiation field and its fabric density change travels at the speed of light but the true gravitational field propagation rate travels at many times the speed of light. This means that the true gravitational field change will occur long before we see the burst of radiation from the exploding star.

    If a star were to vibrate back-and-forth in relation to the earth you would get an increase in density and a decrease in density in the fabric. This you could call a wave but it would not be one you could draw energy from and its wavelength would be huge because of the gravitational field propagation rate.

    Particles. When one thinks about particles one always conceives them as something solid but in reality particles are not solid at all. They are simply bundles of vibrating energy and that vibrating energy can change in size or shape, so in theory you can shrink them to virtually any size simply by making the fabric they reside in denser.

    This thought process has dealt with gravity but of course the other forces, the strong, the weak and the electromagnetic force are all present when mass is created. Here gravity is the weakest force but this may be misleading simply because the other forces are held in check by light speed restrictions while a gravitational field is not. This means that their field strengths are limited to a small area of space making them stronger. If the electromagnetic and strong forces would spread their fields out and cover the same area in space as the gravitational field does their strength would be equivalent to the gravitational field’s strength.

    All forces are developed from the characteristics of the vibrations occurring in particles. Some of these forces may be pure energy and may not contribute to the gravitational field of the particle itself. The three forces came about because of the characteristics of the fabric so by nature they are all linked together in some way. Finding that way is what science is all about.

    Gravity is not a mystery, for the mystery lies in how the fabric works and how it created our universe in the first place.

   There is still much to think about, and maybe this is not my last part.

Your comments are always welcomed at.     gravity@gravityms.com

HOME       TO  PART   1

Author  Cliff Clinton     copyrighted  04/21/2008