GMS Part 7

Particles are a unique construction brought about by a massive amount of energy concentration in a small area in the fabric of space. These particles represent mass and each one is unique. Mass in general is considered solid, but of course we know that it is not solid at all. We know it is a bunch of vibrating electromagnetic energy waves which are moving in complex loops held together because of the non-linearity of the fabric of space. The solid appearance and feeling we get is from the fact that this confined energy concentration of each particle separates itself from other particles in energy levels and also in time.
All energy waves travel at the speed of light, even those confined in a warped space - time condition. This also means that the time reference of that energy is still zero, much like that of a ray of light. There is a great chasm of time between each and every fundamental particle and between those fundamental particles and us. The internal clock of a light wave runs at zero time, our reference, so when it travels it has no way to judge distance, therefore all distances covered by a light wave are seen by the light wave as instantaneous. The internal structure of a fundamental particle experiences the same phenomenon so time and energy within the particle are practically eternal in time to our reference frame. Particle decay is extremely slow due to that fact.

Energy can be expressed in positive or negative terms. A positive can cancel a negative or a negative can cancel a positive but to do so they must coincide and remain that way if the energy is to completely disappear from our universe. But what would happen if at some time in the future something causes the two energies to diverge? In this case we would see the two energies as they were before the coincidence. Energy cancellation is just that, energy cancellation; it is not energy destruction. The two energies in the process are simply converted to other forms but they are never destroyed. This implies that the fabric maintained the knowledge of that energy. It would be no different than two water waves crossing each other's path. The energy in the two canceling waves is still present and moving, it is just that it is not in a condition that makes it observable to us.

A gravitational attraction or field can also be expressed in terms of negative energy, for in a gravitational field an object has less energy, however this is a reference thing, for how you interpret it will depend on where you are standing. The amount of energy that we determine an object has is relative to the individual making the observation. So in reality our definition of energy is elusive and it is only useful to those making the observation because there is no steadfast ground reference frame to make the measurement against.

Because electromagnetic energy levels in the fabric causes a density change in the fabric it causes a change in time as well. We consider ourselves in a positive universe so when we have less gravity we have less fabric density. We never really consider negative gravity in the true sense for it does not appear in our universe. Inertia mass is the only thing we know of that produces a gravitational distortion even though the presence of energy in the fabric increases the density of the fabric in the volume of space it occupies. It does not produce a far-reaching fabric density change which would produce a true gravitational distortion. Gravity is caused by the variation of the fabric density over distance.

The prospects of negative gravity seems unlikely for we either have gravity or we do not. On Earth we have a gravity of one G, therefore we usually reference all other gravity measurements from that. We have no negative gravity to cancel out a positive; we can only reduce the strength of the positive by reducing the mass that created the fabric distortion or in some way create a uniform fabric density that has no distortion. We cannot create an anti-gravity push.

It is a similar condition when we consider positive and negative energy. I am not sure we actually ever reach a true negative energy state where the fabric becomes truly negative. What I mean is that we exist in a positive fabric where we can take all our energy state down to zero but no further. This would mean that we exist were energy fluctuates up and down and at some point we pick a center of reference where we can designate a positive or negative state. We cannot detect energy that does not fluctuate the fabric since energy must be distorting the fabric and be in motion in some way before we know it is there. Energy is something that is ill defined so at the end of this part I will try to elaborate on energy.

I have been very vague on how a particle could create a gravitational field. I have previously proposed that the looping of the energy that creates a particle also creates a basic structural change in the fabric which in turn creates the extended gravitational distortion. But until now I have not been able to see how that can happen. This is a dilemma of my own making for I have linked gravity to the increase in fabric's density while at the same time saying that radiation, no matter how intense it is, does not cause a gravitational field. The two statements make very little sense when one thinks about them so I am now going to clarify how gravity is produced by a collapsing energy field that starts out with no gravitational distortion.

If you have read parts 5 and 6 you would understand how I perceive the formation of a fundamental particle. A brief review. Particles are formed from an extremely dense energy condition in the fabric which curves space to a loop condition therefore linking the vibrating energy into a stable package and separating it in energy and time from its surroundings. The loop condition causes an increase in the fabric density which increases at a greater rate than the energy producing it. When this happens the energy package condenses more causing a further increase in the fabric density which again causes the energy to collapse further.

This process takes a large area of energy and shrinks it to an extremely small area down to the size of a fundamental particle. At this quantum level the process stops and equilibrium comes about. But this process carries with it momentum, thus carries the process further where the energy and the fabric density now reverse their role causing the particle size bundle of energy to re-expand. This new expansion is limited because the previous conditions reappear and again stop the re-expansion. Thus this bundle of energy settles into a self-imposed oscillation and stabilizes. For this process to happen a counter energy must be generated and that energy manifests itself in other forms. Such energy would take the form of a counter force.

This is how I perceive the formation of a fundamental particle, but it is still electromagnetic radiation in a condensed form, therefore it should have no extended fabric distortion which we perceive as a gravitational field distortion. In this state the particle should have no mass inertia but would have a great deal of energy.
As I have noted earlier, inertia is caused by a very large extended energy distortion of the fabric. All energy distorts the fabric thus all energy will have inertia but it does not mean it has an extended gravitational distortion. It does mean that all energies have some mass as we define a mass. The inertia that a particle possesses, with no extended field distortion, comes from the volume of space that the particle occupies in the fabric. Since there is no extended field from the particle that area is extremely small and thus the inertia of the particle would also be extremely small. This being said, all energies including light will have an associated inertia and thus mass, however it is so small it can be ignored. I refer to these particles simply as massless particles.

There are many predictions in Superstring Theory and one is the possibility of space tearing and wormhole creation in a Calabi-Yau shape. Space tearing can produce a wormhole in which two different areas of space are connected. The distance between each face of the wormhole can be extremely short or extremely long. Science fiction writers use wormholes to travel to other stars or galaxies and do so instantaneously. When you enter one side of a wormhole you essentially step out the other side at the same time. It would be just like walking through a doorway but in this case the hall connecting one side of the door to the other could be any length, for no matter how long the wormhole is the transit time across it will always be the same. A simple wormhole diagram is below.

It is a picture generally shown to illustrate a wormhole but the picture never shows the total field generated by the wormhole but only its inner structure. But any fundamental distortion in the fabric is not isolated thus it will possess other field structures to counter and balance out its energy distortion. A negative energy state is said to exist at the heart of the wormhole thus the wormhole structure is distorting the fabric in a more fundamental way than that of energy waves.

I believe our gravitational field is the product of the wormhole properties and its extended fields. When a fundamental particle is formed in most cases a wormhole is created. If one is not, you could call this particle a massless particle. When a wormhole is created the particle's contraction and expansion happens through the wormhole therefore explicitly linking the two and the particle's vibration maintains the existence of the wormhole. Here it is the existence of the wormhole and its extended field that produces the gravitational field. Since this field is huge and occupies a vast amount of space it is what produces the mass inertia that we normally associate with particles.

The gravitational field of a fundamental particle is not like that of Earth's where the field extends outward equally in all directions and falls off in strength accordingly. The gravitational distortion that extends from a particle does so in a thin and decreasing taper which forms what I call the gravitational plane around the particle. The plane decreases in thickness out to some vast distance and then as the wormhole field blossoms it thickens again. This plane is developed by the wormhole's extended field structure. Up close to the outer portion of the wormhole's funnel, which is the area connecting the two sides of the wormhole, the gravitational intensity is strong, very strong. The gravitational intensity of the plane is much stronger and has more influence over that of the conventional gravitational distortion concept but only when the plane impinges on other particles. Particles are in constant motion and their planes continuously sweep the area around them, therefore their influence is only marginal unless you are up close to the outer portion of the wormhole's funnel. The wormhole's plane motion constitutes the angular momentum of the particle.

The wormhole's distortion in most cases is proportional to the amount of energy in the particle that created it. The inertial mass of a particle is the result of the wormhole's spatial distortion, which is our gravitational distortion. We cannot directly observe the wormhole's distortion field. Movement of a particle can be accomplished by moving the particle itself or by manipulating the wormhole's distortion field. If one moves the particle the entire wormhole's field must move with it and since the field is huge the propagation velocity of that field distortion can not be that of light. The movement of the field must track the movement of the particle and do so fast enough to capture the energy put into the movement or the particle's inertia will prevent the movement. Before a particle can be put into motion a certain amount of energy is necessary. If that energy level is not met the particle will not be put into motion and the energy or what tried to move the particle will simply be reflected away. This energy level is where the true gravitational constant comes into being. This number is very small and will be only be seen at quantum level energies.

This is what a particle would look like when vibrating back and forth through a wormhole. Since this is happening at the speed of light it would appear as a single particle even though you are seeing it at two different places. If the wormhole was extended you would only observe one half of the particle's oscillation and see the true size of the particle.

This scenario of the structure of a fundamental particle is purely speculation. The concept seems in some ways to fit other predictions in some past theories. It is believed that a space tearing condition exists in the Calalbi-Yau shapes predicted in string theory. There are other predictions such as wormholes extending through vast distances of space and connecting stars and galaxies. You could envision these extended wormhole funnels as cosmic strings.
In this case an extended wormhole would produce a gravitational spatial distortion around the length of the wormhole's funnel. With this being the case, then in an area of space containing a wormhole's funnel or a multitude of funnels, there would be a true gravitational distortion emanating from that region. Since we cannot observe these funnels we could say that this area of space would contain dark matter because it would have a gravitational distortion without the presence of visible mass.

Since the funnel is the part that distorts space that spatial distortion will be equal along its full length but its spatial field would be quite different from that of a fundamental particle with a very short funnel. The properties of the particle would be unique since the energy in the particle would be sharing two different locations in space. Action at one end could indeed create a response at the other end. This would be an intriguing way to communicate but here we are dealing with individual fundamental particles thus putting us way beyond our present technology.
Here the proportionality between the particle's energy and the wormhole's energy breaks down for the particle's energy and its size is strictly limited due to the fabric's characteristic while the wormhole operates under a set of different laws. This all came about at the beginning of the Big Bang where negative energy was abundant and then trapped in the creation of wormholes.

It is also possible that wormholes can be stretched across short distances by outside forces. Since the particle itself travels from one side of the wormhole to the other through its continuous oscillation, a particle would appear for one instant on one side of the wormhole and in the next instant on the other side. If the wormhole were to be stretched by manipulating the outside conditions of the particle it would appear in space at two different locations. Then if the wormhole was to be re-contracted the particle could wind up on the opposite side of the wormhole thus effectively moving the particle from one area of space to another across a barrier. You could call this process tunneling which is a marvelous quantum phenomenon.

    There are quantum conditions postulated about particles being contained in a box. Probabilities would say the particle could be either inside the box or outside the box and that the particle could at some point pass through the sides of the box. There is a probability that if you leaned against a wall you would eventually pass through the wall.   Of course the length of time necessary to do so would be longer than that of the universe.
The probability of this type of wormhole structuring or elongation would be higher with a single wormhole particle.   If the particle somehow gained energy it could lengthen the wormhole causing this effect.
    This concept of particles and their wormholes would give that probability more credibility. Science predicts many extraordinary things that seem to be total nonsense but they are indeed predicted in mathematical equations in which many of the projections such as those in quantum theory are quite reliable and true and have been proven to be so even though other parts have been questioned. Quantum theory, although difficult to understand, is one of the greatest successes in physics today so its predictions, even though outlandish, have a great deal of merit. We just have not yet understood why.

The presence of a wormhole at the center of a particle and the way the particle vibrates through the wormhole could play a part in how an electron jumps from a lower energy state to a higher energy state in an atom. The electron has a negative charge but because the electron's energy passes back and forth through the wormhole there is an instant of time where the charge disappears. At this instant the electron is no longer attracted to the proton. If external energy is applied at that time it could move the electron away from the nucleus before the electron charge reappears. Once the charge reappears the electron drops back to its original state.

A wormhole has to be present to cause the energy in the particle to have the gravitational inertia mass we measure. The energy in the particle does not always have to be in direct proportion to the negative energy in the wormhole. The length of the wormhole determines the inertia mass or its gravitational distortion. The longer the wormhole the more mass it has. This means that a particle can have the same characteristics and have different masses. There are certain particles that exhibit these characteristics. It is also possible that you could have a small amount of negative energy producing a long wormhole. In this case the mass created would also be small which means the wormhole's extended field takes on a different shape but does not necessarily increase in volume. The amount of inertia mass depends on the volume of space the wormhole's field occupies.

There are still other things we have to consider because when a particle passes from one side of the wormhole to the other it vanishes for an instant of time thus the particle, to us, appears, disappears, and appears again. This means we are only seeing it one half of the time. It would look like the output of a full wave detector in an electrical circuit. Thus we experience some average of the particle's energy. I'm not sure what this all means in our reference frame, but it could have something to do with particle spin.

Depicted below is the possibility of multiple wormhole particles. It's easy to envision a single wormhole particle but more difficult to envision a combination of such wormhole particles. Since the intensity of the fabric's distortion up close to and around the outside of the funnel of the wormhole is extremely strong it is possible for two or three wormholes to join at that point. When this happens there would be interference between the energies vibrating through each wormhole because the particle's energies would still be independent from each other but not have the necessary repulsion to separate themselves from the wormhole's funnel's connections. The particle's vibration complexity would be extreme to say the least for no two can occupy the same space at the same time. I cannot visualize more than three wormholes connected in this manner. The multiple particle configuration would generate some very interesting particle properties which we would see basically as a single particle like a proton or neutron.

I have equated energy to the ripples on a pond; the pond being the fabric and the ripples being the energy we are composed of. But this does not tell you what the energy is. We can only say that the ripples were caused by some disturbance within the pond, or to put it mildly a particular type of disturbance within the pond. It is quite possible that the water in the pond could contain other types of energy that do not disturb its surface. For instance a fish swimming in the pond or a sound wave or a light wave traveling through the pond disturbs the surface of the pond very little if at all. The pond of course is what I would call the fabric which has many properties and there are only certain properties that produce the energies that produce us. Us being the ripples.

There are minute but highly energetic disturbances on the pond's surface which are more than likely caused by the multitude of things going on below the surface. Thus the fabric being the pond exhibits minute distortions and chaos upon its surface.
If certain properties are not present we cannot even observe the pond as being in existence but the energies in the pond are huge. These surface disturbances of fabric we call Quantum Foam.

The red shifting of stars has more to do with objects moving away from each other than the decreasing density of the fabric as the universe expands, however that decrease in fabric density does add into the red shift. Since light has a fixed energy it has to change its frequency as it moves from a more dense fabric to a less dense fabric. It does this to maintain a constant energy level. Light will travel faster, our reference, in a less dense fabric thus forcing it to a lower frequency or red shifting it to compensate for the increased speed. It's all a conservation of energy thing.
These observations of course are relative and they will depend on your frame of reference. Light velocity is always the same but it is measured over time and distance and these become relative when there is a change in density in the fabric.

Basically the expansion creates the majority of the red shift. Galaxies that we see as being 13 billion light years away are really somewhere around 45 billion light years away to where their true location is. This is all due to the way the universe is expanding. It also means we should be able to detect in which direction we are expanding. This is because the red shifted stars that we are seeing were created about two or three billion light years after the Big Bang. The red shifted stars should form a halo or doughnut shaped ring in the sky because their light will be folded back in time. If we cannot find this doughnut shaped ring of red shifted stars and galaxies then we would have to rethink the Big Bang scenario.
The most red shifted stars and galaxies should not be seen scattered in all directions throughout the universe. I am sure there is published information on this phenomenon but I have not run across it yet.

Wormholes are used in science fiction to travel around the galaxy virtually instantaneously. The wormhole may be at any length, from Planks Length to light years in length. It makes no difference, for when you step in one side you step out the other side virtually at the same time you entered. Is such a thing possible? And if so what would make it possible? The wormhole's interior or what I call the funnel is said to contain negative energy and it is this negative energy which opens a hole in space permitting other energy to pass through it. It is hard to imagine such a thing but the theory predicts this phenomenon although it does not predict a faster than light transit. In my scenarios I predict that the fabric under certain circumstances will transmit a distortion through space at a faster than light speed. Here I believe that the wormhole with its type of spatial distortion that it causes in the fabric could indeed permit energy to transit the funnel at a faster than light speed.

Inside the wormhole or its funnel is said to contain negative energy which creates the space tearing condition which produced the wormhole in the first place. These energies can be misleading for as I explained earlier that energy we experience is a fluctuation of the fabric caused by some other energy moving within it. This other energy is the one we are concerned with here. It is the one we cannot detect but it is the one that produces all waves and mass. This sub energy is restrained to the speed of light while it is in the positive fabric.

This sub energy cares not of what it moves through although the characteristics of the fabric controls its propagation rate. The denser the fabric the slower the propagation rate. Relative to us of course. Inside the wormhole we say there is negative energy but this energy is opening a hole in our fabric and pushing it aside. Anyway you could call this an area of negative fabric or an area of no fabric. In this case the sub energy would see this as the last dense fabric and propagate faster.

This negative energy region in the wormhole would offer no restrictions to the propagation of the sub energy waves, thus its transit through the wormhole would appear instantaneous to us. The information contained in the waves of the sub energy would remain intact. There would be no event horizon moment when moving from the outside of the wormhole to the inside. Energy would cease to exist in our positive fabric and then reappear back in our fabric on the other side of the wormhole. Wormholes are usually depicted in a folded space condition but this is misleading for space is not folded. The inside of the wormhole simply has no space and no time but the energy that disturbs our space has no trouble moving through the wormhole.

From an outsiders viewpoint one would enter one side and step out the other. The reality would be the energy waves in our positive fabric caused by the sub energy would cease to exist because there would be no sub energy to produce them in our fabric. The energy passes from our fabric to no fabric then moves through the funnel non-fabric region back to our fabric in which the sub energy movement could now be detected by us once more.

I have depicted the wormholes as being straight just to illustrate them. But wormholes do not have to be straight; they can be curved, bent or twisted to almost any shape. String Theory predicts an infinite number of particle shapes and one could see why. One shape could depict the particle at only one moment of its oscillation period thus there could be thousands of shapes describing the undulations of a single particle.

It is believed that when the universe was created it was created with equal amounts of positive and negative energy and most of the negative energy was destroyed leaving only a small amount of positive energy. In this scenario that would not necessarily be true. Here the negative energy was curled up and became part of the multiple dimensional fabric while the positive energy expanded. In our reference we see the positive while the equally potent negative produces the wormholes thus locking up the negative energy. Negative energy and positive energy act differently in the fabric. Positive energy makes it more dense while the negative pushes the fabric aside and creates wormholes. These wormholes produce a spatial distortion in the positive fabric. Thus it is the negative energy that produces our gravitational distortion. Since it takes a great deal of negative energy to create a wormhole one can imagine the amount of energy locked up in these wormholes. Because the inertial mass was created in the extremely dense environment of the Big Bang the balance between positive energy and negative energy in a wormhole does not have to be equal.
Long wormholes do not necessarily have to have more negative energy than a short wormhole but the difference would be in the shape of the wormhole's extended field. Negative energy does not imply negative gravity or negative mass, it is simply producing a no fabric state. Energy wise the two balance each other out. The destruction of a wormhole produces no energy gain or loss in our reference, only the disappearance of the gravitational distortion is observed with the release of a huge amount of energy. This happens because negative energy and the gravitational distortion cancel each other out.

The vibrating energy in the particle is composed of electromagnetic radiation at extremely high frequencies. In other words it is something like light waves with a positive and negative swing. If for some reason those waves are controlled so that only the positive side or the negative side of the oscillation is facing outward then what we observe would be an electrical charge. It is possible that the wormhole could have some influence on the oscillating waves to produce such an outcome.

Entanglement could be caused by the coupling of the gravitational planes when two particles are close together, then when separated they maintain that alignment. When the particles are far apart their alignment becomes fragile. When the alignment is finally broken it is virtually impossible to create a new alignment when there are literally an infinite number of other particles around. Since the gravitational plane propagation rate is much faster than light the communication between the two becomes unique. Photon entanglement eludes me at the moment but photons do have particle characteristics but because photons move at the speed of light some of those characteristics are not detectable.

The two slit experiment could be explained because the gravitational plane is much more intense than that of our conventional understanding of gravity therefore it would affect the movement or direction of a particle's path more.
When you shoot a particle through a single slit the material on each side of the slit is equal in density. When you add a second slit, let's say to the right of the first, you create a material density imbalance, for the material on the left of the first slip will be denser than the material to the right where the second slit is. This happens because when the plane field passes through a denser material it is delayed more.

It is also possible that a particle could be formed without the formation of a wormhole. This you could call a massless particle which has little or no inertia. There could be any number of these particles present and one could move through them without being hindered but their existence is still present which must be accounted for somewhere. Dark energy acts in that way.

The wormhole idea could give more understanding to why the two theories can not be merged. When energy created the particle and the wormhole the particle is the only thing looked at. The wormhole turns out to be a separate entity and behaves as a symbiotic construction with the particle. The wormhole produces the gravitational distortion but that is not dealt with when a particle is scrutinized. Energy thresholds may very well apply to the wormhole's makeup just as it does to the particle's makeup.

Energy by itself does not produce and make an extended gravitational distortion even if it is highly concentrated. The energy does increase the density of the fabric but the energy and the fabric density track each other until some threshold point is reached. At that point the two do not track. Thus the energy is concentrated but it is not concentrated differently than what it started out like. In reality it keeps its same form but shrinks in size. Therefore the only spatial distortion that is created is confined to the volume of space the energy concentration occupies.

In most cases when the energy concentration reaches the level of the quantum foam a tear in space time occurs producing a wormhole. The wormhole creates an outward pressure on the fabric. This action creates the extended field which produces our gravitational time distortion. The wormhole is kept open and active by the energy expansion and contraction which manifests itself as a fundamental particle. The existence of the wormhole could answer many questions some of which I have listed above.

The conservation of energy and the production of the wormhole produces the necessary properties that create the gravitational attraction. It simply puts time, motion and energy in balance and thus keeps energy at a constant level. Inertia is the only direct connection to the fabric that I know of and becomes extremely important if we ever intend to manipulate the fabric or the distortion we call gravity.